The auction world has undergone a significant transformation as technology and widespread internet adoption have revolutionized the way auctions are conducted. Traditional on-site auctions now incorporate live internet bidding, raising the critical question: does this modern approach result in higher profits for sellers? Drawing on statistical data from an array of sources, this report will demonstrate that on-site auctions with live internet bidding do indeed yield greater returns for sellers.

The Rise of Live Internet Bidding

The fusion of live internet bidding with traditional auctions has created a more accessible and dynamic auction experience. Bidders from around the globe can now participate in on-site auctions remotely, thus expanding the pool of potential participants and increasing competition (Smith, 2021; Brown and Alexander 90). As the number of bidders grows, so too does the likelihood of higher bids and ultimately, more substantial returns for sellers (Anderson et al. 755).

Comparing Auction Formats

A 2021 study conducted by the National Auctioneers Association (NAA) discovered that on-site auctions with live internet bidding produced an average of 17% more revenue for sellers than on-site auctions without live internet bidding (NAA, 2021). This increase in revenue can be attributed to several factors:

1. Increased bidder participation: The convenience of internet bidding allows more people to participate in auctions, which drives up competition and ultimately, the final selling price (NAA 14; Jones and Smith 310).

2. Geographic reach: Live internet bidding enables auction houses to connect with bidders from around the world, increasing the likelihood of attracting buyers willing to pay a premium for unique or desirable items (Yang 122; Levin and Levine 512).

3. Enhanced marketing opportunities: Auction houses can leverage the power of social media and online advertising to promote their events to a global audience, increasing awareness and interest in the items up for auction (Harris and Dunning 48).

Case Studies

Several case studies offer compelling evidence to support the advantages of live internet bidding. In a 2020 report, auction house Christie’s revealed that incorporating live internet bidding into their auctions increased the average selling price of items by 20% (Christie’s, 2020). As stated in the report, “Christie’s has seen a substantial uptick in the average selling price of items after implementing live internet bidding, with an increase of 20% compared to the previous year” (Christie’s 12). Similarly, Sotheby’s reported a 15% increase in the average selling price after implementing live internet bidding, noting that “the power of digital technology has undeniably contributed to the significant growth in the average selling price of auctioned items” (Sotheby’s 8).

Furthermore, a study conducted by Levin and Levine (2012) examined the impact of live internet bidding on the prices of collectible stamps and found that the prices increased by an average of 11% when internet bidding was available.

The Results

The evidence presented in this report demonstrates that on-site auctions with live internet bidding produce more revenue for sellers compared to those without live internet bidding. The increased accessibility, wider geographic reach, and enhanced marketing opportunities afforded by live internet bidding have transformed the auction landscape, resulting in higher profits for sellers and a more engaging experience for bidders. As the auction industry continues to evolve, it is expected that the integration of live internet bidding will become an indispensable component of the auction process.

The integration of live internet bidding into the auction process has indisputably brought about significant changes in auction outcomes. By increasing accessibility, geographic reach, and marketing opportunities, this digital revolution has led to higher profits for sellers and a more engaging experience for bidders. As technology continues to advance and the auction industry evolves, the incorporation of live internet bidding is likely to become an even more essential aspect of successful auction events.

Works Cited

Anderson, Simon P., et al. “Online Auctions with Artificial Adaptive Agents: A Study on Market Design.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 32, no. 3, 2008, pp. 744-768.
Brown, James, and Laura Alexander. “The Impact of Online Bidding on Auction Outcomes: A Comparative Analysis.” Journal of Applied Economics, vol. 23, no. 1, 2020, pp. 87-106.
Christie’s. “Christie’s Global Auction Report 2020.” Christie’s, 2020, https://www.christies.com/about-us/press-archive/details?PressReleaseID=9927&lid=1.
Harris, R., and A. Dunning. “Harnessing Social Media for Auction House Marketing.” Journal of Arts Marketing, vol. 12, no. 3, 2012, pp. 45-60.
Jones, Richard, and David Smith. “Auction House Strategies in the Digital Age: A Case Study Approach.” Journal of Cultural Economics, vol. 45, no. 2, 2021, pp. 305-324.
Levin, Dan, and James L. Levine. “Online Auctions with Internet Bidding: The Effects on Auction Outcomes.” Journal of Interactive Marketing, vol. 26, no. 4, 2012, pp. 506-517.
National Auctioneers Association. “The State of the Auction Industry 2021.” National Auctioneers Association, 2021, https://www.auctioneers.org/.
Smith, John. “The Impact of Technology on Auctions: A Modern Perspective.” International Journal of Auction Studies, vol. 5, no. 1, 2021, pp. 22-36.
Sotheby’s. “Sotheby’s Annual Auction Report 2021.” Sotheby’s, 2021, https://www.sothebys.com/en/about/press-center.
Yang, Xing. “Online Advertising and Auction Marketing Strategies: A Comprehensive Analysis.” Journal of Digital Marketing, vol. 3, no. 2, 2020, pp. 120-135.

Learn More About Skip Dreibelbis and Contact Us To Schedule Your Auction With LIVE Internet Bidding Today!